Skip to main content
MixMaster Pro
Capability

AI Mix Revision Feedback

Upload v2, v3, v4 on the same mix and see side-by-side diffs (Pro/Studio) - which action items cleared, which regressed, and how the score moved.

Upload a New VersionSee Plans

What revision feedback shows you

Revision feedback is specifically structured to answer the questions you have after making changes - not to repeat what the previous analysis already covered.

What Improved

Shows every measurement that moved in the right direction between versions - which action items you resolved, which frequency problems you fixed, and how much each measurement changed.

What Still Needs Attention

Flags any issues that remain unresolved from the previous version, so you have a clear list of what to work on next without re-reading the full analysis.

What to Carry Forward

Identifies decisions from the previous version that worked well - EQ moves that improved clarity, compression settings that helped punch - and recommends keeping them in the next revision.

Version-Over-Version Progress

Tracks the trajectory of your mix across all versions so you can see the overall improvement arc and identify whether you're converging on a finished mix or cycling through the same problems.

How it works

  1. Upload your updated mix

    After making changes in your DAW, export a new bounce and upload it. MixMaster Pro automatically links it to your existing mix session.

  2. The system compares both versions

    Every measurement from the new version is placed side by side with the previous version. The delta for each parameter is computed and evaluated.

  3. You see a focused revision report

    Instead of a fresh analysis, you get a targeted report: what improved, what regressed, what's still open, and what to do next - without repeating information you already acted on.

Revision comparison connects every bounce on the same mix

Most tools score each upload in isolation. On Pro and Studio, MixMaster Pro links revisions to the same mix session - side-by-side diffs for score, checklist items, and key measurements.

You see which action items cleared, which regressed, and what is still open. Maya on Studio can use that revision history when coaching on that mix, so she focuses on remaining issues instead of rehashing solved ones.

  • Version comparison on the same mix (Pro/Studio).
  • Resolved vs open action items carry forward between versions.
  • Client review rounds can attach new bounces to the same thread (Studio).

Example revision feedback output

A typical revision session comparing version 2 of a mix to version 1. Illustrative examples - not real user data.

Example output - illustrative only

Vocal Harshness Improved

Detection

The 3-5 kHz peak that triggered the harshness flag in version 1 is now 2.1 dB lower. Ear fatigue on extended listening is reduced.

Action item

Keep the de-essing and presence reduction you applied. No further action needed on this finding.

Evidence

Upper-mid measurement: v1 peak at +2.8 dB (3.2-4.8 kHz) - v2 peak at +0.7 dB (same range). Finding resolved.

Next step

Shift focus to the remaining open issue: low-end definition between kick and bass is still below target.

Low-End Definition Still Needs Work

Detection

The kick and bass are still competing in the 80-120 Hz range. The previous version showed this issue and version 2 has not resolved it - the delta is only 0.4 dB improvement.

Action item

Try adding sidechain compression from the kick to the bass, or carve a notch at 100 Hz on the bass to create room for the kick transient.

Evidence

Low-end measurement: v1 kick/bass masking score 0.61 - v2 masking score 0.57 (target: below 0.45). Still outside the target range.

Next step

Switch your monitoring to mono and check whether the kick punch disappears - if it does, the bass is masking it in that range.

Chorus Lift Resolved

Detection

The chorus now lifts 2.4 LUFS above the verse, up from 0.8 LUFS in version 1. The energy contrast between sections is now in line with genre targets.

Action item

No changes needed on section energy. The additional layer you added to the chorus arrangement is working as intended.

Evidence

Section energy comparison: v1 chorus lift +0.8 LUFS - v2 chorus lift +2.4 LUFS (target: +1.5 to +3.0 LUFS). Resolved.

Next step

With chorus lift resolved and vocal harshness improved, the remaining priority is the kick/bass relationship from the previous finding.

Example revision comparison structureIllustrative - not an API contract
{
  "parameter": "upper_mid_harshness",
  "version_1": { "peak_db": 2.8, "status": "flagged" },
  "version_2": { "peak_db": 0.7, "status": "resolved" },
  "delta_db": -2.1,
  "verdict": "improved",
  "carry_forward": true
}

Who this is for

Producers in active revision cycles

Keep momentum going through multiple bounces without losing track of what you've already fixed.

Mix engineers on long projects

Document the progression of a mix over days or weeks and have objective data to share with clients during revision discussions.

Producers working with clients

Turn client feedback into structured action items and track whether each revision addressed their requests.

Students learning the revision process

Understand which mix decisions moved things in the right direction and which ones introduced new problems - as measurable evidence.

Know exactly what changed

Upload your revised mix and get a targeted comparison showing what improved, what still needs work, and what to focus on next.

Upload Your Revision

Frequently asked questions

Related capabilities

AI Mix Analysis

Start with a full analysis before your first revision.

Reference Track Comparison

Compare each revision against a commercial reference track.

AI Mixing Mentor

Ask Maya what to prioritize in your next revision.

Audio Tools

Clean or separate audio before the next bounce.